The California Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that analyzes the public disclosure of police body camera footage and demonstrates the overlap between e-Discovery processes and other records production schemes. […]
Court’s Police Body Camera Opinion Highlights E-Discovery Issues Read More »
In the eDiscovery world, we talk a lot about understanding the rules as it pertains to putting a Legal Hold on data, collecting that data, and proportionality. One of the
The pervasiveness of technology in our everyday lives is unmistakable. The next time you walk down a city street, go out for coffee or spend time at a family gathering,
Foundational Ethical eDiscovery for New York Lawyers Read More »
This is the second in a series of posts evaluating the results of Exterro and Duke/EDRM’s 2019 survey of Federal district court and magistrate judges. With information from over 250
This is the first in a series of posts evaluating the results of Exterro and Duke/EDRM’s 2019 survey of Federal district court and magistrate judges. With information from over 250
The implementation of the European Union (EU)’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has raised a number of questions as to how best to approach cross-border discovery. Friction between legal holds
On February 7, EDRM released its Technology Assisted Review (TAR) Guidelines. The Guidelines are the first major work product from EDRM, begun not long after Tom Gelbmann and I handed
EDRM Publishes TAR Guidelines Read More »
For about two years, a group of legal professionals from the EDRM at Duke Law School –judges, lawyers, e-discovery and litigation support professionals—from across the country have been working on
EDRM at Duke Law School Releases TAR Guidelines for Legal Industry Read More »
eDiscovery has become a well-established industry, having been used in litigation for nearly two decades now. And whether we want to admit it or not, nearly every case filed has
Combining Processes & Technology to Make eDiscovery a Standard Business Procedure Read More »
In March 2018, The Sedona Conference published another useful guide for e-discovery professionals, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2) Primer: Practice Pointers for Responding to Discovery Requests. This guide is
The Sedona Conference’s FRCP 34(b)(2) Primer Read More »
