The Breakdown: In a recent decision (Schulte v. LinkedIn Corp.), a federal court in California validated the use of generative AI for document review, ruling that it should be governed by the same established legal frameworks as traditional Technology Assisted Review (TAR). The judge specifically upheld the practice of using negotiated search terms to pre-cull documents prior to AI analysis and rejected opposing counsel’s demands for preemptive “discovery on discovery” metrics without proof of a specific production deficiency.
Why It Matters: This ruling provides crucial legal cover for e-discovery professionals, confirming that existing proportionality and reasonableness standards fully support the integration of AI-powered review workflows without requiring a total overhaul of discovery doctrine.
Read the full analysis over at JD Supra
