Collection and the Duty of Technology Competence – Collection Fundamentals Series, Part 1

Collection and the Duty of Technology Competence – Collection Fundamentals Series, Part 1
A multi-part series on the essentials practitioners need to know about ESI collections
by Matthew Verga, JD, Xact Data Discovery

As electronically-stored information (ESI) has become the norm, as computers and mobile devices have proliferated, and as eDiscovery tools have multiplied, competence with technology has become an essential part of being an effective legal practitioner.  Since 2012, that practical requirement has been slowly becoming a formal one.

The Duty of Technology Competence
In August 2012, the American Bar Association (ABA) adopted updates to its model rules to make the need for technology competence explicit.  Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 establishes a lawyer’s general duty of competence in their work, and the last Comment to that rule covers “Maintaining Competence” over time through continuing legal education (CLE), individual study, etc.  The new updates amended that comment to add technology:

To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject.  [emphasis added]

Over the years since, twenty-nine states have adopted some form of technology competence requirement for lawyers, with most following the ABA Model Rule.  Twenty-six of those states – Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming – have implemented the ABA Model Rule update.  Florida has done so and has also added an explicit technology CLE requirement and addressed reliance on technical experts, and North Carolina has implemented a slightly rephrased version.

Read the full article here