Kelly Twigger: #CaseoftheWeek Episode 110: When are Relevancy Redactions Allowed in Responsive Documents?

ediscovery assistant logo

Extract from Kelly Twigger’s article “#CaseoftheWeek Episode 110: When are Relevancy Redactions Allowed in Responsive Documents?”

In Episode 110, our CEO, Kelly Twigger discusses the increasingly relevant issue of whether relevancy redactions in responsive documents are permitted and how the existence of a protective order impacts that decision.


Introduction

Welcome to this week’s episode of our Case of the Week series brought to you by eDiscovery Assistant in partnership with ACEDS. eDiscovery Assistant is a SaaS based legal research platform and knowledge center for lawyers and legal professionals, and it is the only legal research database devoted exclusively to eDiscovery case law.

My name is Kelly Twigger. I am the CEO and founder at eDiscovery Assistant, as well as the principal at ESI Attorneys. Each week, I pick a case from our eDiscovery Assistant database and talk about the practical implications of that decision for you, your clients, and your practice.

Before we dive in, if you haven’t yet had a chance to grab our 2022 Case Law Report, download a copy of that for your perusal. Each of the decisions in eDiscovery Assistant is a public link, meaning that you can link to those decisions in your writing. You can also review the full text of the decision without having a subscription to log in.

Read more here

ACEDS