Extract from Reveal’s article “eDiscovery SaaS vs. On-Prem: What’s Best for Law Firms”
How should a law firm choose between cloud-based and in-house discovery systems? In many cases, eDiscovery SaaS offers lower upfront costs, faster deployment, and scalable flexibility, while on-premise can offer tighter control and predictability for firms with strong infrastructure.
According to the ABA, 73 percent of law firms already use cloud-based legal tools. It underscores the rising confidence in remote systems and the pressure to modernize. Are you risking overhead, security, or growth by sticking with on-prem?
Today, we’re taking a closer look at eDiscovery SaaS vs. on-prem models, exploring common pitfalls, decision criteria, and which approach aligns best with different law firm goals.
What Is the Difference Between SaaS and On-Prem?
With eDiscovery SaaS, the software runs on remote servers managed by a third-party provider. Law firms access it through a secure internet connection. This setup removes the need for physical servers, which cuts hardware expenses and reduces internal IT demands.
